Assessment of COPD Exacerbation Severity with the COPD Assessment Test (CAT)

Exacerbation severity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) can be reliably assessed with  the COPD Assessment Test™ (CAT), according to a new study from the UK.

“There is currently no widely  accepted standardized method for assessing symptom severity at exacerbations in  COPD patients,” said Dr Alex J Mackay, MBBS, MRCP, clinical research fellow at  the Academic Unit of Respiratory Medicine, University College London. “Incorporating  CAT scores into the assessment of COPD patients may provide a standardized,  objective method for assessing symptom severity in both clinical practice and  clinical trials.”

The  findings were published online ahead of print publication in the American  Thoracic Society’s American Journal of  Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine.

The study involved 161 COPD  patients who completed the eight-item CAT questionnaire at least once under  supervision at the clinic. The CAT was also completed by 75 patients during 152  treated COPD exacerbations. The CAT is a validated health status questionnaire  that has been successfully used in previous studies to measure COPD symptoms in  both primary and secondary care settings. It includes questions assessing cough,  phlegm, chest tightness, breathlessness, activity limitations, sleep, and  energy levels.

Frequent exacerbators (≥2  exacerbations per year) had significantly higher baseline CAT scores than infrequent exacerbators.  CAT scores in the 152 exacerbations assessed rose significantly from an average  baseline value of 19.4±6.8 to a value of 24.1±7.3 at exacerbation. Change in  CAT score from baseline to exacerbation onset was weakly but significantly  related to change in CRP but not to change in fibrinogen. Rises in CAT score  at exacerbation were significantly associated with falls in forced expiratory  volume in one second (FEV1). Median recovery time, as determined  using symptom diary cards, was significantly related to the time needed for CAT  scores to return to baseline.

“In our patients with COPD, CAT  scores reflected exacerbation severity, as measured by both exacerbation length  and reduction in lung function,” said Dr. Mackay. “CAT scores at exacerbation  were also weakly related to systemic inflammatory markers and were elevated in  stable patients with a history of frequent exacerbations. Our results indicate  that the CAT can be used as a score of the multi-dimensional nature of COPD  exacerbation severity.”

“The CAT is validated, free, and  easy to administer, and can be easily incorporated into the usual care of  patients with COPD at no additional cost,” concluded Dr. Mackay. “It may also  be useful in clinical trials as an objective measure of new interventions aimed  at reducing exacerbation severity. Since our results indicate  that CAT scores may reflect levels of systemic inflammatory markers, albeit  weakly, this finding may have particular relevance in clinical trials of  anti-inflammatory therapeutic agents in COPD.”

To read the article in full, please visit: http://www.thoracic.org/media/press-releases/Mackay.pdf.

Contact for  article:
Alex J Mackay, Academic Unit of Respiratory Medicine, University College London Medical School, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London NW3 2PF UK
Email: alexander.mackay@ucl.ac.uk